Echo chamber. I mentioned Narcissus earlier. They're still here, bouncing around in fragments. As long as some cultural continuity persists there'll be ancestor soup. We're swimming in it, naming ourselves after its ingredients, working for it, dying.

All the most righteous things like love, summer on grass and sunshine, all encompassing senses of contentment, religious experience, justice, whatever the ideal is... All the most righteous things, that we hold up as an answer to control? Are also instruments of control.

The World doesn't have an outside.

I feel a step away from everyone. Half muted to everything. We all seem to be moving in circles around each other, around our phantom treasures and banal shames. Fear and tinsel. A life on parade and the crowd just hums, blurs to flesh tone cloud. Less, the soft roar of wind over tall grass and a whiff of salt. The clay is cold between my toes. Still water, receding too slowly to notice. My reflection glittering blue and gray. We speak together, playing octaves:

What is all, any of this?

Remember that simply waking up in the morning can change everything.

Date: 2012-12-28 05:21 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] keplers_angels
someone was just talking to me about polar coordinates. and I was only half-listening. something about how we learn the cartesian coordinates first and then become so confused and even when we think we understand polar coordinates, we're still just interpreting them into cartesian. and not really, really fluent. and how wrong that is....circles being circles....and trigonometry being so....organic....

Being, myself, not-on-good-terms with polar coordinates, I let this whole commentary slide by, feeling momentarily deficient in the magical simplicity of circularity.

When you say "The World doesn't have an outside" I feel frightened and bereft, so many of my most important moments seeming to exist there, and I picture Kepler's models and I need to know if it had an outer shell what shape would it have?

Do ghosts obey geometry then, in a world with no outside?
Euclidean or... some complex (mathematically speaking because the imaginary must be considered in discussions of ghosts) topological space?

superposition

Date: 2012-12-29 06:22 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] keplers_angels
I would say that outside the context of classical physics---or rather, in the context of quantum physics--is the only place where abstraction becomes reality.

I've been plotting a genocide on ghosts. Psychic-flame-throwers... The ones in my mind didn't disturb me terribly until I was forced to consider that others may have ghosts in my image that they carry around, that they measure me against. That was when I decided they all should be exterminated. At least the ghosts of the living. I have no argument with ghosts of the dead.

Nevertheless,
I suspect there is truth in that topology. It looks easy enough to map, but impossible to meaningfully traverse while earthbound. What a splendid model for the geography of ghostspace.

Re: superposition

Date: 2012-12-31 04:51 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] keplers_angels
But think of all the beautiful mistakes you would miss out on.

Re: superposition

Date: 2013-01-01 03:43 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] keplers_angels
But I am getting images of Operation-like removing, with a cheap tweezer, the blurry little ghosts that haunt my day and night dreams.

I'm not sure if they should be released into the wild or destroyed like a malignancy....or maybe saved in formaldehyde for scientists.

Date: 2012-12-31 12:22 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] therainingtree
Somewhat o/t:

Why do we think of ghosts as dead? If they exist (which I don't believe), then they are a life form.

Re: Because they are dead.

Date: 2012-12-31 02:37 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] therainingtree
Uh, okay.

I would posit that if something has desires, it is alive by (nonscientific, I guess) definition.

Re: Because they are dead.

Date: 2012-12-31 03:11 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] therainingtree
Well, sure, but isn't that a separate question?

For that matter, wouldn't it depend on the "medium"? If a ghost were the continuing action of the actual same neural impulses ported somehow onto a new "platform" when the original body died, then arguably that *is* the same entity.

Re: Habitual Metaphors

Date: 2013-01-02 04:06 pm (UTC)From: [personal profile] therainingtree
I'm not sure the point of origin's continuance should matter. (In fact, if it did continue, that'd be more of an argument for the new "copy" being a new and separate entity.) I used to be entirely maintained by my mother's amniotic fluid, and now I'm not, but am arguably still the same entity.

Profile

italiceyeball: (Default)
All Eight

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213 14151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Page generated Apr. 12th, 2026 11:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios